Unborn | Written by Srividya MS and Vipashyana Hilsyan | March 8, 2021

It’s 2021, the years that passed by, featured women fighter pilots, women in space making moonwalks, women in power heading the most powerful nations, in finance making tough financial decisions for nations. The years have been all about women taking charge, changing the world.

Contextually, India takes pride in the gradual but deep-rooted progressions made in the sex parity front. Rising sex ratios are quantifications we most comfortably rely upon, but at the end of the day these are just figures, aren’t they? 

A masquerade that hides innumerable sufferings, violations, damage and distresses. Concurrently exists a world of a flimsy progressive character and hollow promises, Meera’s world.

With tears rolling down her cheeks and her lips trembling, Meera laid down on a bed in a room filled with the smell of trauma and pain.  The past few years flashed before her eyes. She remembered the day when her now-husband, Sameer, had come to see her in the village. “He is a very understanding guy. He is kind. He will keep you happy,”she was told by voices surrounding her. She remembered her vivid thoughts when she said yes to the prospect of marrying this guy. They were primarily, how since he was educated, seemingly wise and lived in a city, he would take care of her and would be understanding. But now, today, sleeping on the bed, she realized how wrong she was. The realisation was heavy and painful. She slowly began thinking of how things went downhill from the day she thought would be the happiest day of her life.

“I am pregnant,” Meera exclaimed to Sameer.

“Wait, are you sure?” Sameer had asked with eyes gleaming with excitement.

“Of course, I am sure”.

“That’s great! Let’s go to the doctor tomorrow for a check-up”

The following morning, the couple filled with dreams and happiness had stepped into the hospital.

An hour and a couple of scans later, the couple found themselves sitting in a room anxiously waiting for the doctor. The doctor came in with a smile and congratulated the couple. The doctor added in a bit of advice on the care that needed to be taken for the child’s health. The couple came home smiling ear to ear and announced the news to the family.

The family was overjoyed when they heard the news. Every member of the family was making their plans with regards to the child. While one knitted clothes, another brought toys. An atmosphere of warmth coupled with excitement settled in everyone’s hearts. After all, the couple had been trying to conceive for a long time and were blessed with a child after many years.

In yet another general check-up after the first trimester, there hung a board that read in bold “Strictly following the Pre Natal Diagnostic Technique Act 1994, our centre does not indulge in sex determination of the foetus.” However, Sameer, reluctantly so, could not resist asking this one question. “Doctor, I am going to be the father of a boy, right?” The doctor was startled. She said, “Why is that important? And it’s illegal for me to check for that under the laws. Didn’t you see the board outside?”

The doctor proclaimed, sensing his intentions, “For your information Sameer, Section 6 of  THE PRE-CONCEPTION AND PRE-NATAL DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES (REGULATION AND PREVENTION OF MISUSE) ACT, 1994, clearly prohibits the determination of the sex of the foetus. Any attempt to do so is a punishable offence.”

Sameer in an unflinching manner said, “Oh come on! I know what you are talking about, but, it is necessary for me to know the sex of my child. Having a girl would be unsuitable, almost a matter of shame.  Society would laugh at me. And also what is the point of having a girl child? It would be a burden on my shoulders.”

Despite Sameer’s frustration, the doctor refused to indulge in the illegal practice of sex determination.  She said, “So what would you do once you know the sex of the baby?   Let me warn you right now, any action in the direction of harming the baby or harming Meera in order to abort the foetus will make you a criminal.” The board that hung outside the clinic saw various cases, successful deliveries, complications, this was certainly not the first time someone put forth such a shameless request to this clinic. Here it was, yet again.Things just seem to get worse with time. After returning home, Sameer made a couple of calls. He came back and said with a smug. “That doctor acted all moral and upright. Now, I found a doctor who will tell me the sex of my child.” Meera was mortified. Her heart whispered, “You know what will happen to your child if it is a girl.” With a trembling voice, fearing that her heart will be true, she said, “Why are you so adamant on this? Why not be happy with this blessing? The husband turned around and said,” Don’t talk as if you don’t know the ways of the world. If a girl is born, how is it a blessing? I want to make sure that this is a blessing.”

“But, all these years, we pined for a child. How does it matter if it turns out to be a girl? It is still our child.”

Sameer was now visibly annoyed, “Of course. It is nice for you. You don’t have to go out and earn. But I am worried about the costs I will have to incur to provide for a girl. And after all that, what is the point? She won’t carry on the name of the family. Beyond all that, I will have to give dowry to marry her off. Aren’t these reasons enough to want a boy?”

In a quiet voice, Meera asked, “What will you do if it’s a girl?”

“For obvious reasons, I will get rid of it before it is too late.”

The next day, Meera’s fears came true. It was a girl child. But, she desired the baby. She could not let the child die before it sees the light of this world. She had to do something.

Meera tried pleading with her husband as he went about arranging for an abortion. She argued about the fact that a boy and a girl were equal. She kept emphasizing and reemphasising the fact that a girl has a lot of potential too. However, Sameer was clouded with ignorance. He wanted the abortion to be done no matter what.

Meera was very scared at this point. She didn’t know what to do. She knew that if she spoke against her husband, she would be frowned upon. She shuddered at the thought of her family’s reaction if she goes against her husband. She did not even know if her parents would agree with her on this. She tried thinking of someone who would stand behind her after she took such a drastic step. She could not muster the courage to go to the police.

She could hear someone else weeping along with her. Someone smaller, someone softer. She looks around and realizes that it is her unborn child. She could feel her heart melt with every weep that she heard. Her child seems to say “Don’t I have the right to see the world? To dream? To hope? To aspire? It has been proven time and again why a woman is equal to a man. But, is there a need to achieve something to live? Don’t girls have a right to life on par with boys? Aren’t we entitled to the same world?”

Meera felt very ashamed listening to these words. She didn’t stand up for her child even before it was born. She had to stand up not just for her daughter, but for herself too. She couldn’t do that to herself. She could not allow people to bully her around into this, even if that person is her husband.

Meera with shaking hands reached out for her phone. It was time for her to take a stand. She quickly scurries across the room, to avoid being heard or seen by her husband. She found a contact of the doctor who had initially refused to conduct the sex determination test. She heard a familiar voice on the other end. With a heart filled with desperation, she began begging the doctor for help. She could feel her desperation roll down as tears. She prayed in her heart for an intervention from the doctor. Slowly in a shaking voice, she fills the doctor in. Meera calmed down when the doctor said she will protect the foetus, no matter what. The doctor arrived at the mother’s house with the police. Sameer made attempts to refute the facts. The police found the reports of the sex determination test. The doctor was filled with anger at the audacity of the father. She said in an angry tone, “. It is a matter of shame that India in 2021, still deals with patriarchal perceptions in the background of a technologically sound world. The fragile bubble of seemingly stable scenarios of reducing gender gaps and improving sex ratios come crumbling down when one looks at such incidences.”

The police Inspector said in a strict tone, “the Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, prohibits strictly the determination of sex of a foetus.  And also, Sections 312-316 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) enumerate consequences of miscarriage and death of an unborn child, the penalties range from seven years to life imprisonment for fourteen years and fine. And mind you, since your wife, does not seem to consent to these actions, as per Section 313, you will be liable to pay a fine along with life imprisonment or imprisonment for 10 years. All these laws have been enacted to tackle the diminishing/disproportionate sex ratio of the country and to provide an equal right to live to a girl. Any attempt to circumvent them, as you did, qualifies one as a criminal.”

Meera heaved a sigh of relief for her child and herself, as she heard sounds of people taking Sameer away.

Undertrial Prisoners in India: Shouldn’t the justice system instead be on trial? | Written by Jayesh Singh and Aashish Gupta | August 6, 2021

“It is said that no one truly knows a nation until one has been inside its jails. A nation should not be judged by how it treats its highest citizens, but its lowest ones.”

― Nelson Mandela

The night of June4 was just a regular evening for most of us. Finishing the day’s work, people had gone asleep at their usual hours. I was up till late preparing for my upcoming exams. Around mid-night, I heard the rattling sound of a jeep drawing close. Brushing aside the curtain, I leaned over the window and saw a police jeep pulling by. The monotony of the day quickly evaporated into thin air. The police officers climbed up the stairs and knocked on the adjacent apartment. By now, everyone was awake. Our neighbour, Lata aunty, answered the door and the police asked for her son, Nikhil. Scared of the unexpected visitors and with tears rolling down her wrinkled eyes, she ran hurriedly to her son. Following her, the officers barged in and took Nikhil into custody for posting some allegedly seditious content on Facebook. Lata aunty wept incessantly and prayed the police to leave her son. The jeep drove off. 

After spending over two weeks in police custody and a month later, Nikhil today is an undertrial prisoner and languishes in a local jail waiting to be released on bail. He stays in a small cramped up cell along with three other inmates and has transformed from a youthful young man to a skinny and depressed stoic who is losing against the justice system. 

Theoretically called a correctional place, the jail had succeeded in dehumanising him with its stinking toilets, spoiled food and lack of medical facilities among other hardships cast on the inmates. Back at home, Lata aunty’s heart disease had exacerbated. She wished to be alongside her only son. Having his bail application dismissed multiple times, Nikhil fears becoming a part of the jail’s rooster coop where the undertrial prisoners lose all hope of freedom. 

Same as Nikhil, there are lakhs of undertrial prisoners languishing deplorably in the jails today. Specifically, around 70% of India’s prisoner-population consists of the undertrials. The story of Father Stan Swamy and others arrested after the Bhima Koregaon incident speaks volumes of the deplorable state of India’s justice system. Arrested in October 2020, Father Swamy was an undertrial prisoner suffering from Parkinson’s disease who died awaiting his final bail hearing. The experiences of Nikhil and Father Swamy sends shivers down my spine and I am forced to think how the law enforcement agencies themselves fail to grant the legal rights available to undertrial prisoners in India. 

The foundational principle in a criminal justice system is that of ‘innocent until proven guilty’. An undertrial does not lose his rights merely by being an undertrial. He is to be afforded the same treatment in the eyes of law as any other natural person. Even when a person is convicted of a crime, he/she is not reduced to a position where his/her legal rights can be violated at the jail administration’s whims. There is a bundle of rights which an undertrial prisoner always possesses. Some of these rights are: 

  1. Right to receive interim bail on serious illness of oneself or close family members

Under the Indian law, bail is recognised as the norm and jail as an exception. However, the conditions of bail depend mainly on the offence for which the accused has been convicted or charged with. Therefore, a bail hearing entails an analysis of the gravity of charge, severity of punishment, and danger posed by the accused to society, among other factors. Clearly, the discretionary elements involved in granting a bail on medical grounds are many. However, the ground rule is that inmates are entitled to bail on medical grounds subject to fulfilment of certain conditions.

One of the most important part of a human’s life is his family and if one of the family members is suffering from a serious illness, his life will also be affected severely Courts have recognised that since an undertrial is a human being, he will be affected significantly when one of his family members and especially someone, like his mother, is seriously ill. It is the duty of the court to understand the feelings of an undertrial and grant him bail to meet his mother. Under Article 21, emotional connect and relation between the close family members is recognised as one of the most important facets of human life.

 1. Right against inhumane form of investigation afforded under right to life:

Nobody can be subjected to any questionable investigative technique in any circumstances, even when it is in the context of an investigation in a serious criminal case. Proceeding with such acts would result in an unwarranted intrusion into an individual’s right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution. Therefore, it goes without saying that an undertrial prisoner can in no circumstance be subjected to torture. The prohibition against violation of the right to life applies to all limbs and faculties necessary for enjoyment of life. The clause also bans mutilating the body by amputating an arm or limb, blinding an eye, or destroying any other organ of the body. The right to life extends beyond a human being’s physical survival or animal existence. 

2. Right against solitary confinement: 

In the case of Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration, the Supreme Court held that the solitary confinement should be imposed only in rare circumstances, such as when the prisoner is so aggressive or dangerous that segregation becomes an absolute necessity. Even in this case, the solitary confinement cannot be permanent or for a prolonged period and the inmate shall be released from it after a proper assessment of the situation.

3. Right to receive free legal aid:

Everyone, no matter whether he is guilty or not, have the right to represent himself in the court. Even if he is not financially capable of hiring a counsel, the State is obligated to provide him free legal aid. One cannot be called guilty unless he has been given a chance to justify his stand and provide justifications for his actions. No undertrial can be denied their right of legal aid. Apart from this, there are various other rights which are present for the protection of prisoners such as: 

  • Right to speedy trial
  • Right to education
  • Right to receive magazines
  • Right to live with human dignity 

Indian law makers have taken cognizance of this issue and passed some laws which protect the rights of prisoners. Although, these laws are inadequate to provide protection to prisoners but still hold importance. Following are the legal provisions:

  • Rights under the Prisons Act, 1894

This is the first legislation passed in India with respect to rights of prisoners. It contains following provisions :

a) Section 4 talks about Accommodation & Sanitary Conditions of prisoners in the prison.

b) Section 7 talks about providing safe custody and shelter to prisoners in case there are excess number of prisoners in a prison and it is not possible to shift them to some other prison at present.

c) Sec 24(2) talks about examination of prisoners by qualified medical officer.

d) Section 27 talks about separation of prisoners, containing female and male prisoners, civil and criminal prisoners and convicted and under trial prisoners. 

e) Sections 31 and 35 of the Act talks about treatment of under trials, parole and temporary release of prisoners.

  • Rights under the Transfer of Prisons Act, 1950

This statute was passed to minimize prison congestion. The convicts are moved between States for vocational training and to alleviate overcrowding. This Act gives several rights to the prisoners and aims at the protection of prisoners against any kind of brutalities. It talks about providing vocational training to prisoners in order to make them skilled.

Even though these rights and laws are enshrined in Indian legal framework, the condition of prisoners in Indian prisons is still pitiful. With each passing year, the cases of brutality with prisoners and their ill-treatment keeps on increasing. The law makers have a duty to remove the loopholes in the existing statutes and bring dynamic laws to limit the excessive power of investigation agencies and police authorities. At the end, an undertrial prisoner is also a human being and no one has the right to take away his basic rights away.

If you or anyone around you is facing an infringement of your legal rights, then you may reach out to us for legal assistance.

Domestic Violence – The Shadow Pandemic | Written by Lavanya Agarwal and Pradyumn Bisht | July 19, 2021

A week-long lockdown had been announced yesterday.
Again, Sunita sighed as she struggled to get out of her bed and start her daily routine of household chores. She didn’t like such long lockdowns which trapped her in her own house. Damn this pandemic! She exclaimed. It closed her ways to escape during the day from the more real and nearer threat than an invisible virus.
She went to the corner of the room to the small and tarnished mirror on the wall, to check on her bruises from last night. They would last longer this time. She glanced at her soundly sleeping husband, Ramesh, across the room and sighed again. She already missed going to work. Shaking off her dread for the coming week, she got busy with the morning chores…

Elsewhere, the morning alarm went off. Neha peeked out of her comfortable blankets and groaned. She had to wake her kids up for their so-called online classes. She groggily made her way to them while thinking about her to-do list. She had a lot of chores to do as her maid, Sunita, won’t be able to come due to the lockdown. She woke up the kids and, “Dad will stay at home for a week now. Yay!” they squealed excitedly. This brought Neha to her senses. She hurried off to make breakfast for the family, but first, she had to hide the alcohol. It was one thing that could ruin the whole week for them. Then she started to think of the activities that could keep her husband, Shekhar, busy for the whole week at home. Anything to keep him away from the thought of alcohol. She made Shekhar’s favourite breakfast and started off the week with an optimistic smile…
It had been three days now, and Sunita was too tired to even stand. Her whole body screamed in pain, but she didn’t have a choice but to bear with Ramesh. She trudged her way to the kitchen to the rice container to stash the last few notes of two thousand rupees into it. She knew that if Ramesh came to know about this hiding spot for money, she will have to face his renewed wrath and a fresh round of beatings. She was the sole earner in this house and she had to save the money from Ramesh’s extravagant habits, to make their ends meet. Suddenly, her phone rang.
“Hello, Sunita. How are you?” Neha said from the other side.
Suddenly, Sunita wanted to cry and vent out all her pain to Neha didi. Even though Sunita worked at Neha’s house, she considered her a generous friend. She enjoyed spending her time at their house, with Neha’s kids.
Sunita controlled her emotion filled voice and said, “I am good, didi. How are you? How are the kids?”
Neha sighed and said, “They are good and safe.” Then she lightly asked, “By the way, I can’t find the balm and painkillers. Where did you put them?”
Both the ladies went quiet for a moment as Sunita grasped the real meaning behind those words. Shekhar babu must have found his alcohol last night and abused Neha while drunk. When compared to Ramesh, Sunita felt that at least Shekhar babu was decent enough to feel guilty about it, though that didn’t change anything.
Sunita quietly said, “I kept them in the back of your almirah’s drawer.”
Neha curtly said, “Okay. Take care.” and hung the phone.
Being a domestic violence victim herself, Sunita was acutely aware about her surroundings. She had known that Neha didi was also a victim when she had noticed the bruises and red marks on her face one day. But Neha didi hid her pain well for the sake of her kids. Neha didi didn’t earn but she wanted to be a nice mother to those kids and provide them with all the facilities and a complete family with Shekhar babu.

After applying the balm and taking some painkillers, Neha started to think about Sunita. She knew Sunita was also a victim and always stood in silent solidarity whenever Shekhar had had one of his drunkard episodes. She chuckled at the irony of their situations.Sunita was the earning member for which her husband, Ramesh, beat her out of his frustration of unemployment and inferiority complex. On the other hand, Shekhar was the earning member in this house and Neha was the homemaker. He started beating her around the time when they went through financial crisis and he resorted to alcohol. Then in his drunken state, he would vent out all his frustration and work stress on Neha in the form of abuse, all the while relishing his superiority complex and control over his wife. Neha could have left him there and then, but Shekhar was good with apologizing and looking guilty. She always forgave him and hoped for a better future. By the time it became a habit, to get drunk and beat his wife, they already had children. Now, Neha chose to stay with Shekhar because she wanted to give her children a good future. She was determined to end this cycle of abuse, but not at the sake of her children. She knew better now, that it is futile to expect better from her husband. After all, there can never be a good reason to abuse your spouse.
She thought Sunita was lucky to not have children. Sunita didn’t have them because she didn’t want to trap herself with the responsibility of a mother but have the option to leave Ramesh whenever she wanted. But she was just fooling herself, because if she could have left Ramesh, she would have, a long time ago.
No, Sunita and Neha both, in spite of the class differences, didn’t have the luxury of an open-minded society who wouldn’t abandon and shame them for leaving their husbands. Sunita and Neha came from very different worlds and societies and both knew it was foolish and wrong to call this tormenting life their fate. They were trapped by the shackles of societal expectations and pressures about how a woman should compromise and adjust with her husband. The legal provisions for them were left to shame and at the mercy of the advocates of an unjust society and customs. Nobody deserved this kind of mistreatment. Nevertheless, they plastered a smile on their face, took a deep breath and went about their life like always.

In India, more than 30% of women have been subjected to domestic violence at some point in their lives, per the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) data. Yet, nearly 75% of those who reported being subjected to domestic violence did not seek help from anyone. For those who do, by confiding in close family members, the crime often gets brushed off as a private or family matter that doesn’t require outside, legal intervention.

The COVID-19 period has brought the offence of domestic violence to the forefront and aggravated it to an alarming rate as the victims have been forced to live together with their abusers coupled with poverty and unemployment during the lockdowns. During the initial phases of the lockdown, Indian women filed more domestic violence complaints than recorded in a similar period in the last 10 years. But even this sudden spike is only the tip of the iceberg as most victims do not seek help in India. Even though the full scale of the issue hasn’t yet been grasped, it is being termed as the “Shadow Pandemic” or “crisis within crisis”, not just in India, but all over the world. In India, there are certain provisions those seek to protect the victims and punish the abusers under the law.
The Protection of Woman from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
Domestic violence is defined by Section 3 of the Act as “any act”, omission or commission or conduct of the respondent shall constitute domestic violence in case it:
harms or injures or endangers the health, safety, life, limb or well-being, whether mental or physical, of the aggrieved person or tends to do so and includes causing physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal and emotional abuse and economic abuse; or
harasses, harms, injures or endangers the aggrieved person with a view to coerce her or any other person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any dowry or other property or valuable security; or
has the effect of threatening the aggrieved person or any person related to her by any conduct mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2); or
Otherwise injures or causes harm, whether physical or mental, to the aggrieved person.

Furthermore, Domestic Violence was added as a Criminal Offense under the section 498A of the Indian Penal Code in 1983. Under this section harassment for Dowry by the family members of the husband or by husband is recognized as a crime.It particularly covers the cruelty faced by wedded ladies at the hands of their spouses or their husbands’ families. Under the Law, the acts of cruelty include, but are not limited to, the physical abuse; psychological torture by threatening her or her loved ones (such as children); not giving the woman food; locking her in or out of the house as punishment; and sexual abuse against the woman’s will. It also includes any and all intentional behaviours against a woman which force the women to attempt suicide or risk to life or grave injury or risk to limb or overall health. Here, health incorporates the physical and mental health of the women. The convicted abusers are charged with imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both.
Domestic violence, also called intimate partner violence, is a type of violence committed by someone in the victim’s domestic circle. This incorporates partners & ex-partners, family members, close relatives and family friends.Unlike Sunita and Neha above, the victims, be it a man or a woman, need to speak against domestic violence. Only taking a stand against it will end the cycle of abuse. Moreover, the legal remedies and provisions won’t be put to use unless the society supports the victims and takes a stand against it.
A first, legal step would be to approach the police for help or to seek the help of a Protection Officer, appointed by the government to assist victims of domestic violence. It may be useful to consult a lawyer and/or have the support of an NGO or a woman’s rights organization in such matters.The National Commission for Women has also launched a WhatsApp number 7217735372 too for victims of domestic abuse.

The Menace of Manual Scavenging Written by – Namrata Jeph and Jayam Jha Published on- June 30,2021

“Manual scavenging is the worst surviving symbol of untouchability.”
Rahul is a 19 years old boy, born and brought up in the Mayanagri of Mumbai. Both his parents are doctors and were able to provide him a life full of comfort and luxury. Rahul is currently doing his graduation from one of the top universities in India. One day, his sociology professor gave a lecture on how untouchability is still being practiced against certain communities. For Rahul, this lecture brought back a distant childhood memory. During one of summer vacations, when he visited his grandparents, he remembered his grandma telling him not to talk to or go near a person working outside, because he was apparently what is called as “Bhangi”. Apart from this one incident, he remembers to have read about it in very brief in an unimportant corner of his school textbook. However, as a child he failed to realise the seriousness of this problem.
More recently, Rahul attended a webinar wherein the keynote speaker, Bezwada Wilson observed how governments have enough resources and modern equipment to launch satellites after satellites and to land on moon but not to provide modernized machines to sewer workers so that they are not forced to enter into manholes; manholes which asphyxiate them to death. People from communities that traditionally worked as “manual scavengers,” still collect human waste on a daily basis, load it into cane baskets or metal troughs, and carry it away on their heads for disposal at the outskirts of the settlement.This observation in particular caught Rahul’s attention. To understand the issue better, Rahul chose to conduct a survey on Manual Scavenging and Untouchability for his sociology term project. In pursuance of the same, Rahul visited a place called “Nala Road”, which was even named so because an open sewer canal runs parallel along with the road.
On his visit, while on one hand, Rahul found it difficult to breath properly even from distance due to the awful smell, he witnessed the deplorable sight of sewer workers dipped deep inside the canal up to their knees handling slurry with their bare hands. Rahul gathered his courage and stepped in direction where a man named Sunil, who appeared to be in his mid twenties, was standing. Rahul explained him the reason for his visit and requested him to answer some of his questions. Rahul not only sensed Sunil’s bewilderment (probably because he was not accustomed of people coming and empathizing with him and his work), but also his hesitancy in answering questions (probably because Sunil himself felt ashamed talking about the nature of the work he does). An excerpt from the conversation is provided below:
Rahul: What all kind of work you do as a part of this?
Sunil: Well, anything that involves interaction with excreta. For instance, the manual cleaning of dry latrines, sewers, manholes and septic tanks, removal of debris from sewage canals etc.
Rahul: Can you throw some light on hazards associated with this work?
Sunil: There are many as a matter of fact. For instance, exposure to poisonous gases and asphyxiation while working in manholes and septic tanks etc. My own father died working in the manhole!
Rahul: When this work is so hazardous and unsafe, why do you and others here continue it?
Sunil: Do you think we have chosen this life for ourselves!!? We do what we do because we have no other option. Most of us do not get to go to schools due to abject poverty that we live in. Those who somehow manage to get enrolled either are left behind in race or are otherwise deliberately denied work because of our castes. We have been doing this work since generations and there seems to be no way out. People think we are born to do this and are worthy of only this. I have some of relatives who live in villages, they are made to do this compulsorily by the Panchayat itself.

This encounter made Rahul realise why and how people continue to undertake a work which is unsanitary, undignified and above all, legally banned by Parliament since 1993. Most of the workers who are working as a manual scavenger like Sunil are unaware about various constitutional as wells as the statutory provisions which are meant to safeguard the rights and interests of these workers. Some of these provisions have been enlisted below:
Section 3 of The Employment of Manual scavengers and Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993completely prohibits the employment and engagement of any person for manually carrying human excreta or construct or maintain a dry latrine.
Section 5 of Prohibition of Insanitary Latrines and Employment and Engagement as Manual Scavenger Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) prohibits the construction of an insanitary latrine and also prohibits the employment and engagement of manual scavengers.
An “insanitary latrine” means a latrine which requires human excreta to be cleaned or otherwise handled manually.
Section 7 of the Act: “No person, local authority or any agency shall engage or employ any person for hazardous cleaning of a sewer or a septic tank.
Anyone who contravenes section 7 of the act for the first time is to be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years or with fine which may extend to two lakh rupees or with both and any subsequent contravention shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to five years or with fine which may extend to five lakh rupees, or with both.
The Act provides for the rehabilitation of any person included in the final list of manual scavengers published in pursuance of the provisions of the act in the following manner:
He shall be given, within one month, a photo identity card, containing, inter alia, details of all members of his family dependent on him, and such initial, one time, cash assistance, as may be prescribed.
As per the provisions of the relevant scheme of the Central Government or the State Government or the concerned local authority and subject to eligibility and willingness of the manual scavenger:
His children shall be entitled to scholarship.
He shall be allotted a residential plot and financial assistance for house construction, or a ready-built house with financial assistance.
He, or at least one adult member of his family, shall be given training in a livelihood skill, and shall be paid a monthly stipend of not less than three thousand rupees, during the period of such training.
Subsidy and concessional loan for taking up an alternative occupation on a sustainable basis shall be provided to him or at least one adult member of his family.
He shall also be provided any other legal and programmatic assistance as per the requirements.

The hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Safai Karmachari Andolan v Union Of India(2014) has ruled to identify the families of all persons who have died in sewerage work (manholes, septic tanks) since 1993 and award compensation of Rs.10 lakhs for each such death to the family members depending on them.

Article 17 of the Constitution of India abolishes “untouchability” and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of “untouchability” is an offence punishable in accordance with law.
Article 21 of the Constitution of India enshrines that no person shall be deprived of his life and personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law. Various rulings of Supreme Court have interpreted right to life to include right to live with dignity.
In the course of completion of his project, Rahul found some startling data which made him question all the apparent progress that we claim to have made.
According to a national survey conducted in 18 states, atotal of 48,345 manual scavengers have been identified till January 31, 2020.
814 deaths of manual scavengers engaged in cleaning sewers and septic tanks have been recorded in India from 1993 to July, 2019 in 20 states and UTs.
While replying to a question raised in the Lok Sabha, Ramdas Athawale, Union Minister of State for Social Justice and Empowerment,revealed that between 2015 and 2019, 376 people died of asphyxiawhile cleaning sewers and septic tanks.
Out of 376 deaths from 2015 to 2019, families of only 200 sanitation workers who died between 2015 and 2019 were paid full compensation, 75 received partial amount and 101 have not received any compensation at all.
Talking to Sunil, made Rahul realize that the issues of poverty, indignity and caste are not only interconnected but also reinforce each other. It is clear that government policies have not been properly implemented. People remain unaware of their right to refuse their roles as manual scavengers, and those who do refuse face intense social pressure, including threats of violence and expulsion from their village, often with the complicity of local government officials.The manual carrying of human faeces is not a form of employment, but an injustice akin to slavery. It is one of the most prominent forms of discrimination and violation of human rights. What is required not only ending the practice but also ending the abuses faced by communities engaged in manual scavenging.

Child Orphans from COVID-19: A Fictional Account | Written by Fatema Kinkhabwala and Soumya Kaushik | Published on May 27, 2021

What a year it has been. The pandemic led to so many children not having a roof over their head, or a mother to sing them to bed, or a father to struggle for the remote with. Every night, every call, made it a little tougher for me to sleep at night. My work with CARA (Central Adoption Resource Authority) recently met with some fruition with my promotion but it all felt so bittersweet.

I woke up in the morning to the piercing sound of ambulances passing my home. It was day 401 of the pandemic but everyday was a blur of calls, coffee and the banter of my co-workers. 

CARA was located in West Block 8, RK Puram in New Delhi which was a 10 minute walk from my home. After getting a cup of Rama’s hot coffee, I got to the receiving end of the phone that had never stopped ringing since the pandemic had started. 

I picked up the phone. Heaving and sobbing sounds from the other end of the line alerted me about the sense of emergency that the lady extended. ‘Namaste Ma’am, Central Adoption Resource Authority, how may I help?’. ‘Sir.. Sir, I’m Deva, my didi’s son Akarsh, he’s alone sir, please help me’, responded the lady. ‘ Ms. Deva please could you provide me with certain details such as the age, parental status of the boy, and the city and state you are calling from’, I replied with a heave. Calls from relatives of orphaned children had become regular after we had started to run our rural awareness campaign.

After noting down Akarsh’s details, I asked the lady to stay composed and assured her that according to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015 and Adoption Regulation, 2017 as a relative of the child, she could put up Akrash for adoption. I went on to explain that the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) will have to declare Akarash legally free i.e declare him to be either an orphan, abandoned or surrendered (OAS) child so that he can officially start his procedure for adoption. After an exchange of commiserations, I let Deva know that my colleague would be in touch with her and put down the phone with a heaving sigh. Deva and Akarsh were located in Bihar, so I called Brijesh, one of the Point of Contacts at the State Adoption Resource Agency (SARA) Bihar which was the nodal authority for the promotion, facilitation, monitoring and regulation of the adoption programme in the State.

After transferring the details for Akarsh, I put the phone down. I caught my breath, the swell of a heavy day cut the crisp air. I took a sip of my  warm coffee, its bitter taste felt as an appropriate match for the present circumstances. Before I could let my heart clench at this thought the shrill sound of the phone broke my reverie.

“Namaste Sir” came a distressed voice from the other side; I am calling from the Delhi Police Juvenile Justice Unit. I wanted to ask about the child that we had rescued last week.”

‘Deepak’, I thought to myself. He had been rescued from a child trafficking racket by the Delhi Police. Instances of child trafficking have skyrocketed during the pandemic and children who have been orphaned are particularly vulnerable to these rackets, Deepak being one such victim. 

Deepak which literally means light was forced into the ugly darkness of human trafficking; I laughed bitterly thinking about this irony.

“Yes Sir, as per Section 28 of the Juvenile Justice Act, Deepak was first produced before the Child Welfare Committee and after conducting inquiry on all issues relating to and affecting the safety and well-being of the child as per Section 30, he was brought to us.” I informed the police officer.

“Thank you Sir, I wanted to call and check in because the issue of child trafficking has been growing like an unsuspected tumor in the time of this pandemic. Especially during the second wave, numerous messages of adoption appeals for children who have been orphaned due to covid-19 have been circulating on social media like Twitter and Whatsapp. These unwarranted activities are leading to child trafficking in the garb of adoption as the appropriate procedure is not being followed.”

“That is right Sir” I replied, “the correct procedure is that first such an orphaned child must be reported on the National Childline-1098. After that the District Child Protection Unit (DCPU) will undertake a social investigation to find the family members of such a child who can be given the custody. Failing which, the child may be declared as legally free for adoption. If this is not followed then it can expose these kids to trafficking as social media provides a channel to by-pass the law and ‘adopt’ them.”

“Moreover, restoration and rehabilitation of children like Deepak, who are in immediate need of care and protection is specifically undertaken by the Specialised Adoption Agency and only those people and institutions who are deemed as ‘fit person’ or ‘fit facility’ after due verification of their credentials as stated in the Juvenile Justice Act are allowed to adopt or take care of the child.”

“I agree Sir, seeing this mayhem unfold I just wanted to ask about Deepak. However, I will now let you attend to the soaring number of calls that I am sure you must be receiving during the 2nd wave.” With that the line got disconnected.

The police officer was right – Call number 216, I thought to myself as I unconsciously kept a tally of the ever increasing calls.

My glasses were fogging up and as much as I wanted to convince myself that this is purely because face-mask and glasses are not an ideal match, I could not ignore the wetness near my eyes. Will these children ever experience a normal childhood? Will they ever get a closure? In a country where mental health is still a taboo will anyone recognize their agony or will they be pushed into the dark void of trafficking?

“TRRRR” suddenly the sharp, piercing sound of the phone didn’t feel unwelcomed as it drowned the harrowing voices in my head.

“Namaste Sir, Rakesh reporting.”

“Namaste Rakesh,” I said, returning the greeting. “Tell me what made you call me today?”

Rakesh, was a colleague and an old friend of mine, we worked together at the State Adoption Resource Agency before I got promoted here.

“Sir, I have some good news to share.”

I sat up straight; my movement so quick that my old, rickety chair jerked forward – hearing these words was a rarity during a global pandemic.

“Our team had gone for the monthly inspection of foster families to check the well-being of the child as mentioned under Section 44 of the Juvenile Justice Act. We carried out our inspection in the prescribed manner and interacted with the family and found out that he had been enrolled in a school and was attending his online classes. During our visit we saw him struggling to understand basic mathematics and believe me when I say that I have never been happier seeing a child struggle before.” 

I could feel his smile behind the receiver of his phone. I perfectly understood what he was saying. After years of working with orphaned children, seeing them get a family to call their own filled you with an unparalleled sense of gratification. They might struggle, but this time they will have a family to prop them up after every stumble.

I felt my mask rise up a bit and its strings tighten around my ears; I realized I was smiling too.

We continued our conversation, catching up and asking each other’s well being, before I looked at the orange tinted sky and took that as a sign to end our call. I got up and stretched my rusty joints, before leaving I grabbed a stack of pamphlets with me. This was a part of our effort to spread awareness as everyone cannot access our website or call us, thus we decided to put up pamphlets so that those in need could still reach out to us. 

As I was sticking up the pamphlet near a market joint, I admired the changing hues of the settling sun. It was a bright orange at some places, a somber red in the centre and the corners were quickly turning dark signaling the incoming night. However just like the sun I would be back at my work tomorrow, ready to light those dark corners.

Pamphlet

PROCEDURE FOR CHILD ORPHANED BY COVID

  • If a child has become orphaned due to his parents passing away because of Covid-19, the relative, guardian etc must call the Childline services @ 1080
  • The Childline Services will help produce the child at the nearest District Welfare Committee whose job is to ascertain the immediate needs for the child’s rehabilitation. 
  • Post this, the child may be returned to their caregivers or put in the right institutional or non-institutional care

PROCEDURE FOR CHILD ADOPTION 

  • A child in India can be adopted by an Indian citizen, NRI or a foreign citizen, irrespective of their gender or marital status.
  • Prospective adoptive parents need to get registered with an authorized agency. Recognised Indian Placement Agencies (RIPA) and Special Adoption Agency (SPA) are the agencies which are allowed to make such registrations in India. 
  • A social worker for the registration agency will make a visit to the home of the prospective adoptive parent in order to do a home study. Post this the agency will intimate the interested couple/ individual when-ever there is a child ready for adoption.

For more details visit: http://cara.nic.in/ 

Child Marriage: Snatching Away Dreams from the Eyes of Millions | Written by Raja Reeshav Roy and Bhavya Kansara | Published on May 11, 2021

It was yet another scorching day of April, in a small village not too far from the capital of Rajasthan, when Anandi came running to her home with the biggest smile on her face and with great enthusiasm told her parents that it was the happiest day of her life. The indifferent father asked her the reason behind the excitement, answering to which Anandi slowly took out a certificate from her bag and showed it to her parents and said that she has secured second position in class 9th in the entire Bhilwara district. Her parents smiled a little, which appeared to be a mere formality and just to keep her heart for what they were about to tell her. The mother hesitantly told Anandi that her father had matched her a fix and they were planning to marry her on the occasion of Akshay Tritiya, which is considered to be the most auspicious day for solemnizing child marriages.

Anandi was a 14-year-old lively young girl who had the aspiration to make something out of herself and dreamt of a life bigger than what her parents made her live. She was one of the brightest students, not only in her school but also in her district. However, little did she know that her fate had already been determined by a repressive age-old practice that continues to temper the lives of many Anandis in different parts of our country. She belonged to a poor family from Bhilwara, Rajasthan. Her family consisted of her father, mother, elder brother and her grandma. Anandi’s father was a small farmer who was trapped into a vicious circle of debt and poverty. He wanted to transfer the burden of raising a girl as quickly as possible and, therefore, being crushed under the fetters of poverty, he decided to get Anandi married to a 27-year-old man in exchange for a bride for his elder son. This popular practise of exchanging a daughter in return for a daughter-in-law is called Atta Satta and it is very prevalent in various communities of Rajasthan.

Tears rolled down her eyes as her mother narrated her fate and she ran to her room hoping that all this was just a nightmare. She then went to her mother and begged not to do this to her and confessed about her dream of getting educated and becoming a doctor. Anandi’s mother, who was also married at a young age, understood her plight as she knew about the agonizing pain of dreams being crushed under this archaic tradition. She could not see her tears and, therefore, decided to stand up against this deep-rooted patriarchal evil so that her daughter could carry on with her education. With the courage of the size of a boulder, Anandi’s mother requested her husband that they should not get Anandi married at this age and instead they should give her a chance to fulfil her aspirations. Her Bapu got furious listening to what Anandi’s mother just proposed and blatantly shot down her request warning her to never bring this up again. 

A month passed and the next academic session was about to start, but her parents didn’t allow her to join class 10th in the anticipation of her marriage. As luck favoured, one day Guddu Bhaiya came to visit her. Guddu Bhaiya was her first cousin and had just started practising law in Rajasthan high court after graduating from a law school. He met Anandi and while conversing with her, Anandi’s mother broke the news of her marriage. Guddu Bhaiya was shocked to hear this. He tried to talk to Anandi but his aunt interrupted the conversation by emphasising on the fact that Anandi does not have any say in this. Anandi’s mother said that their decision was full and final and there should not be any further discussions on it. 

Later that day, Guddu Bhaiya somehow got a chance to interact with Anandi and again asked her about what she wants to do and Anandi broke down in tears this time. She told him about everything she has been going through since April, starting from the day she secured 2nd position in the 9th standard to how she is being forced to marry a man who is more than a decade older than her. She told him about her dream of becoming a doctor. She further said that even if she is not the brightest student, she knows that it’s illegal to marry a girl before the age of 18.

Guddu Bhaiya was happy to hear this and said “Shaabash Anandi” and added “I will make sure that you will not be married against your will and also until you complete your studies.” He then talked to his aunt and uncle and explained to them about the legal, social, physical and mental aspects of child marriage that a young soul has to face. 

Consequences of Child Marriage: 

Guddu Bhaiya tried to explain how early marriages can have a dreadful impact on the lives of young girls. At a young age, when a girl should be given the freedom to play and build her career, this evil practise of child marriage snatches her childhood and shoulders her with the responsibility of looking after her family, and raising kids. She loses her freedom of expression and is expected to follow what her husband orders her. This way, child brides are more likely to become victims of torture, abuse and exploitation at the hands of their husband and in-laws. Even if she tries to raise a voice against this torture, she is suppressed by her own family who tries to justify this by saying that there is no harm in a man beating his wife. 

Guddu Bhaiya also explained how such kind of violence adds to mental trauma and leads to depression and anxiety which often becomes lifelong trauma, thereby, impacting the mental health of that girl badly. Not only this, when a girl is married at an early age, it also tends to affect her sexual health. Due to a lack of awareness and access to modern medical facilities to avoid or postpone pregnancy, she is exposed to early and multiple pregnancies before she is even physically mature and psychologically ready to give birth. Early pregnancies lead to greater health complications among young girls and, therefore, the infant and maternal mortality rates are also higher in these situations. Poverty and illiteracy are the root causes of child marriages and these early marriages can, in turn, lead to a perpetual cycle of poverty. Guddu Bhaiya adds on to say that keeping in mind all these aspects, we have several laws in place which prohibits Child Marriage in India and if any person is found to marry off a young girl, then he shall have to face severe legal consequences. 

Guddu Bhaiya listed the following Legal safeguards against Child Marriage in India:

  • Prohibition of Child Marriage Act (PCMA), 2006 – This law was passed by the Indian parliament to replace the Child Marriage Restraints Act, 1929. As per this Act, child marriage is a punishable offence and provides that any person, who performs, conducts, directs or abets any child marriage would be punished with imprisonment up to two years or fine up to 1 lakh, or both. It also provides for the appointment of a Child Marriage Prohibition officer whose duties are to prevent child marriages and spread awareness regarding the same. The law makes child marriage voidable and a decree of nullity can be obtained by a girl who has entered into a child marriage within 2 years of attaining the age of 18 years. 
  • Constitution of India – 
  1. Equality before Law and Prohibition of Discrimination on Grounds of Sex – Although child marriage affects both sexes, girls are disproportionately affected because of early pregnancies, domestic and/or sexual violence, and restricted educational opportunities. Thus, child marriage violates the fundamental right under Article 14 as well as under Article 15. 
  2. Protection of life and personal liberty – Child marriage violates the fundamental right under Article 21 by exposing them to a continuum of harms, including violence and reproductive health. It also violates their Right to privacy, which encompasses protection of the personal intimacies of the home, the family, marriage, motherhood, procreation, and child-rearing. 
  3. Prohibition of Traffic in Human Beings and Forced Labour – The practice of child marriage reflects the commodification of women and girls and it is no less than a slavery leading to violation of Article 23 of our Constitution.
  4. Right to education –Child marriage deprives girls of their right to education enshrined under Article 21A of our constitution. 
  5. Article 39 – Child marriages not only robs children of their youth but also leads to abuse and exploitation of young girls. This DPSP aims at providing children with the opportunity to develop healthily with freedom and dignity so that they can be protected against exploitation and from moral and material abandonment. 
  • Domestic Violence Act, 2005 – As per this Act, any women living in the domestic setup either with her in-laws, parents or guardians, if subjected to any kind of physical violence or mental trauma as discussed in the act will be considered as a victim of domestic violence. The abuse could be in the form of physical, sexual, verbal, emotional or economic, or the threat of abuse and the person committing the crime will be liable as per the provisions of the act.
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 –As per this Act, an act of sexual intercourse by a spouse of a person below eighteen years is an offence irrespective of the gender or age of the victim or the accused. This is punishable with a fine and a minimum term of 10 years of imprisonment which may extend to life imprisonment. Also, in all cases of child marriage, as the girl is below 18 years of age, therefore, apart from the provisions under PCMA, aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act can also be charged.
  • Indian Penal Code – There is no specific provision for Child Marriage in IPC, however, as per Section 366 of the IPC, kidnapping/abduction of a woman to compel her to marry and the use of any other method of compulsion is a punishable offence. Moreover, going through a marriage ceremony with fraudulent intention is also a punishable offence under Section 496. Section 370 of the IPC can also be invoked to book a case of trafficking for marriage.  Further, The Supreme Court of India on 11th October 2017 read down Exception 2 to Section 375 and ruled that sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his minor wife would amount to rape for the purposes of Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 

Guddu Bhaiya was finally able to convince them after much persuasion. Anandi was lucky to have a Guddu Bhaiya in her life, even if not for Guddu Bhaiya, Anandi was a bright and a self-aware girl and she might have found some other way to escape from this misery, but all our sisters and daughters are not Anandi. There are lakhs of Anandi in our country. As per the data of UNICEF, One in three of the world’s child brides live in India and of the country’s 223 million child brides, 102 million were married before turning 15. 

Today we have to take a vow that we have to be someone’s Guddu Bhaiya or if not Guddu Bhaiya, we have to memorise the lessons of Guddu Bhaiya by heart so that no other Anandi in this country has to face this misery. Child marriage is not only a violation of human right, but it is illegal and irrational as well, it further completely destroys a young soul in most cases. If we truly want to emerge as a Vishwaguru we have to keep our women safe and happy in every possible sense and child marriage is one such menace present in our society that has to be done away with as soon as possible. 

Respect Old Citizens Written by- Tanvi Kaushal And Pooja Rajawat Published on- March 22,2021

Gauri- “Did you keep my arthritis medicine?”
Manav- “Yes, I did. I also kept the heating pad for your back pain”
Gauri- “Remember the kids told us to not take anything essential from the house because they want to rent our house as a fully-furnished room, so be careful and if you have taken anything essential, keep it back or you know…..”
Manav- “Yes, I know, I won’t take anything from the home I built from my own two hands”
They both continue packing.
Manav and Gauri got married 40 years ago and raised three young and bright kids. They were a normal middle-class family for most of their lives. Manav ran a small construction business and Gauri was a teacher in the town’s elementary school. They never let their kids feel like they couldn’t follow their dreams because of financial troubles; they did whatever they could to support them. Each one of them went to a renowned university, got married and had a family of their own.
The couple was very diligent in putting away a part of their incomes as savings for a secure and independent retirement. They did not want to burden anyone. They seemed like the perfect little family, but then the family was struck by series of disasters, all rolling in, one by one. The elder son had a gambling problem and he gambled away all his money, including his house. The younger son’s firm filed for bankruptcy and he lost his job. The daughter’s practise was hit by a law suit which caused immense financial loss to her. Like the ideal parents, Manav and Gauri offered to help each one of their kids with money, they knew this will drain their savings, but they did it anyway. They also took a mortgage on their house and didn’t tell anyone.
Slowly all the kids started getting back on their feet and got busy with their lives again, but in the process, they forgot about the parents who helped them..
The couple started to have financial troubles of their own; they could barely make the ends meet. They could not make mortgage payments and the bank had threatened to take their house way on more than one occasion. Manav had a lot of pride to ask his kids for money, but this problem was not going away, he had retired and their savings were gone, so after a lot of deliberation, they arrived at a conclusion that they would ask their kids for some help, but to their dismay, all three kids refused to help them, giving some vague reason as to why they couldn’t help.
Manav and Gauri were devastated. They raised their children with values and morals. They helped them out in every way they could. They knew the kids had means to help them but they were just reluctant to do so. There was no light at the end of this tunnel.
The bank threatened to take away the house in fifteen days if the mortgage payment wasn’t met. Manav was too scared to ask for help again because he feared if they refused again, it would crush his heart. But Gauri secretly asked the younger son to just help with the mortgage payment so that they can keep a roof over their head, she cried over the phone talking to her son. He said he would figure something out and they should not worry. His solution was to send Manav and Gauri to an old age home and rent the house through which the payment of mortgage could be made.
The door opened and Manav and Gauri came out with a suitcase in their hands. With a heavy heart, they looked at their house for the last time and sat in the cab. Manav told the address to the driver and asked: “Could you drive through downtown?” The driver told them that it was not the shortest way. “I know, but there is no rush, as we are on our way to a shelter home. We have no family left”. The couple had tears in their eyes.
When they reached the old age home, they were greeted by several old men and women. Both of them were seated in the garden surrounded by others.
One of them asked, “What brought both of you here? Did you not have any children?”
“We have three children but probably they forgot that they have parents.” said Manav with his throat choked.
While Manav wailed inconsolably, Gauri went on talking, in a voice that was cold and piercing like a shrapnel, “I gave birth to the three and see what they did? They forced us out of own home. They are all well-settled financially. They have got everything for themselves, but nothing for us. They have forgotten how we spent our entire life for them.”
“I can understand the pain you both are going through. All of us here have experienced it at some time or the other which brought us here.” said an old woman sitting next to Gauri.
Today the definition of family is transforming from all-inclusive to “me, my wife and my kids. Old parents become a burden for them.” said another old man who listened to their conversation with a stone-cold face.
“But that does not mean that we cannot do anything.” came another voice. “We are weak but not completely helpless. We have recourse to the law.”
“Now at this age, you want these weak bones to go to the courts and die even before the case is settled. With no money even for food, from where we will afford the hefty fees of the lawyers.” said Manav in a disapproving tone.
“Things aren’t the same anymore. We are no longer supposed to go to the courts in order to get what is our right. We just need to take the first step.” said an old woman.
“Provisions have been made in the Constitution of India to preserve the rights of those aged above 60. Since these articles are part of Chapter IV of the constitution which corresponds to Directive Principles, they cannot be enforced by a court of law as stated in Article 37, however, they are the basis upon which any legislation is drafted.” she explained.
Article 41 of the Constitution secures the right of senior citizens to employment, education and public assistance. Meanwhile, Article 46 asserts that the educational and economic rights of the elderly must be protected by the state.
The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Act was enacted to ensure parents and senior citizens are given basic amenities. The act under Section 2(b), defines maintenance as including provision for food, clothing, residence, medical attendance, and treatment. Unlike claiming for maintenance under Section 125 of CrPC wherein the senior citizen will have to approach the Court bearing expenses to file and litigate suit and spend a lot of time, under MWPSC Act, the process was made simple. Parents and senior citizens may claim for maintenance only under one of these statutes. The Act makes it mandatory for children or legal heirs to provide the basic amenities to their parents or grandparents (or senior citizens). Maintenance Tribunals have been established to ensure the implementation of the law.
The Tribunal may, during the pendency of the proceeding order children or relative to make a monthly allowance for the interim maintenance of such senior citizen including parent and to pay the same to such senior citizens including parent as the Tribunal may from time to time direct. Monthly maintenance of up to Rs. 10,000 can be awarded and the children or relative should deposit this within 30 days from the day of the order by the tribunal. Senior citizens can also revoke transfer of property in case of negligence by relatives. The failure to comply with the maintenance orders issued by the Tribunal can also attract imprisonment.
Section 17 of the Act states that no party to a proceeding should be represented by a lawyer while parents or senior citizens may avail the services of the Maintenance Officer appointed by the State Government.
“There are also various provisions to facilitate us in or day-to-day lives apart from the maintenance act.” came another voice.
As per rights guaranteed under the National Policy for Older Persons, 1999, all Indian citizens aged above 60 are entitled to a 30 per cent concession in ticket prices while travelling with the Indian Railways. The concession is 50 per cent for women aged above 60 along with the provision for separate counters and other services including berth requests.
While different religions have varying laws in place to protect the interests of senior citizens, some are very particular such as the statutory provision for maintenance of parents under Hindu personal law contained in Section 20 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956. Similar laws are found in Muslim laws, Christian laws, and even Parsi laws.
Section 88-B, 88-D, and 88-DDB of the Income Tax Act of India allow senior citizens to claim a discount in tax. The elderly is also entitled to get higher interest on tax saving plans apart from having a wide variety of LIC policies and post office saving schemes to choose from.
“But how can I go into a legal battle with my own children. Even though they have forgotten to care about us, we can’t do the same to them.” said Gauri at last after listening to the people surrounding her. “Even I felt that I could never go against my children but your necessities force you to take legal recourse and make them realise their duties.” Said an old man.
“Manav and Gauri, you should file an application. We are all there to support you.” came distinct voices.
With a deep sigh said Manav, “I wish they would have understood it on their own that we are not a burden but their responsibility. We will get the money for maintenance but I hope we could also get the love and respect from our children. We could get the warmth of our home and live together as one family.”